-
Appreciation in Donor-Advised Funds: An Analysis of Major Sponsors
Feb 10, 2021, 19:15 PM -
Philanthropic Freedom
Sep 18, 2020, 17:38 PM -
Donor Privacy: Expanded Protections, Growing Threats in 2020
Aug 28, 2020, 08:59 AM -
The Little Economic Engine That Could: Fueling Success at Community Colleges
Jun 26, 2020, 09:33 AM -
High-Impact Civic Education Projects: A Guide for Donors
Jan 2, 2020, 13:03 PM -
Declining Divorce in Jacksonville: Did the Culture of Freedom Initiative Make a Difference?
Oct 28, 2019, 17:59 PM -
A New Frame of Mind
Apr 16, 2019, 11:44 AM
Federal Legislation
There has generally been little interest at the federal level in requiring the disclosure of charitable contributions. One piece of legislation introduced in 2020 that might force donor disclosure in limited circumstances is the U.S. House of Representatives’ H.R. 5929. The bill would require publicly traded corporations to reveal dues and other payments made to nonprofits organized under Section 501(c) of the tax code if the recipients engage in either “independent expenditures” (expenditures “expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate”) or “electioneering communications.”
While few, if any, charitable organizations are likely to be affected, the definition of “electioneering communication” could potentially include speech by charities about issues, as the Independence Institute (a Colorado-based think tank organized as a 501(c)3 charity) learned in 2017. It tried to run ads encouraging Coloradans to contact their U.S. senators and ask them to support sentencing-reform legislation—but the Federal Election Commission determined (and the U.S. Supreme Court agreed) that the ads were electioneering communications because one of Colorado’s senators was up for election at the time the ads would have run. That meant the Independence Institute would have had to disclose some of its donors.